On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 4:58:54 PM UTC-5 Brent wrote:
> > So I still don't know what your point is. You just repeat sections of the > website...which is interesting. But so what? Can you not state your point > clearly and explicitly? > > Brent > > You posted a link in a previous message: > How about this one? > > https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.251302 > > Brent (Signals of a Quantum Universe, by Daniel Green and Rafael A. Porto) The article you posted concludes: *As a consequence, this theory propagates information instantaneously everywhere in space-time.* I was supporting this via quantum computing: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/programming-quantum-computers/9781492039679/ch04.html *In this chapter we introduce a QPU program allowing us to immediately teleport an object across a distance of 3.1 millimeters! The same code would work over interstellar distances, given the right equipment.* It seemed your comments about "random" and "speed of light" were meant to contradict the claim of the paper you posted. That made it unclear what your point of posting this paper (Signals of a Quantum Universe) was. @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/768dfd44-80b4-4f0b-b46e-82fc4da4d061n%40googlegroups.com.
