On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 5:59:04 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Jul 2020, at 20:05, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> I thought the big application of QC after encryption, was going to be 
> protein folding and similar biomolecular interactions.
>
>
>
> That is how Feynman discovered quantum computation, in a more informal way 
> than Deutsch quantum universal Turing machine. 
>
> You thought? What did change your mind? Quantum simulation will be the 
> main application of quantum computations for the millennia to come … once 
> we get genuine big frame quantum computer.
>
> I agree with Clark that topological quantum computation is the most long 
> term promising path, but to squeeze an electron and braid its plane moves 
> requires immense apparatus/magnet. The first genuine quantum computing 
> machine might be very huge. That will not easily been miniaturised. But 
> then IBM was using giant trucks to transport for its first 5Mb hard drive 
> in 1955, and I expect huge progress in condoned matter physics, and some 
> serendipitous discovery along the way…
>
> Bruno
>
>
Graphene reduces the dimension of QM to 2-space plus time. In effect it is 
two dimension if the wavelength of quantum states is longer than any atomic 
thickness to the sheets. 

LC
 

>
>
>
> Brent
>
> On 7/7/2020 4:56 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> Dr. B may still be right though. 
>
> 30 years from now quantum computers (as promoted in 2020) will still have 
> no impact on practical computing applications. Maybe in cryptography, or 
> maybe not.
>
> Though quantum aspects in materials science could turn out to be useful, 
> so its impact on computing will be of a peripheral nature (in sensors, 
> etc.).
>
> @philipthrift
>
> On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 at 5:59:54 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 6:44 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  > *If we can factorise a number sensibly bigger than 15 in my lifetime, 
>>> I will be impressed*
>>
>>
>> Back in 2017 the number 291,311 was factored by a quantum computer:
>>
>> The experimental factorization of 291311 
>> <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.08061.pdf>
>>
>> John K Clark
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e9c1b6d8-5ba1-4a43-96ba-6daad2ccb575n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e9c1b6d8-5ba1-4a43-96ba-6daad2ccb575n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d32cfba8-347d-0cb6-df80-21c85d1edb49%40verizon.net
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d32cfba8-347d-0cb6-df80-21c85d1edb49%40verizon.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b998dc41-de35-4c23-b27a-6ca614986f22o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to