If you are saying that Hydro either works or it doesn't I am in total 
agreement. The main thing since March has been not hydro, by itself, but in 
combination with zinc, which has long been used for the proverbial common cold, 
(sometimes works!) and even pneumonia's. Getting zinc in the cells is the 
claim. By itself, hydroxychloroquine is jack. Now, if hydro + zinc is 
ineffective, then screw it. The campaign against hydroxychloroquine is not 
medical science, but the technique of US political theorist, Saul Alinsky:  6. 
“A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging 
and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest 
better ones. 
Now the best thing is to find drugs that really work in fighting the infection, 
and yes, finally some vaccines! Beyond this, it is worth it for me as a 
taxpayer, to pay the billionaire pharma boards of directors all the cash they 
need (want) to give us all a break. This would be worth a tax increase if 
needed. 

-----Original Message-----
From: PGC <[email protected]>
To: Everything List <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Aug 6, 2020 6:00 am
Subject: Re: Sharpiegate



On Thursday, August 6, 2020 at 11:33:37 AM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:


On 31 Jul 2020, at 22:06, spudboy100 via Everything List 
<everyth...@googlegroups. com> wrote:
You really must read up on your history more Bruno, That term comes from the 
nazis and not I. Here is a 2015 Scientific American article reviewing a book by 
Philip Ball,  The Struggle for the Soul of Physics. https://www. 
scientificamerican.com/ article/how-2-pro-nazi- nobelists-attacked-einstein-s- 
jewish-science-excerpt1/
I am accusing the politicization of medical science 

That has been aggravated by the “marijuana conspiracy”. The book by Jack Herer 
remains a chef-d’oeuvre of investigation. He cites all its sources, and I have 
verified all of them. 
The problem is that when we do money with medication, there is an incentive to 
make people sick, and to avoid efficacious medication. Like the slogan sum up 
well: a cured patient is a lost client...




and the observations of physicians who have claimed that hydro can be helpful.

I am not an expert to really judge this, but I know enough of logic to find 
mistakes in some critics against Didier Raoult (in France, a well-known 
pro-hydorxychoroquine). Then I learned that in many countries they are using 
hydroxychloroquine, with a success which seems better than with remdesivir. 
None of them are pananacea, and hydroxyhlorquine has to be used with a lot of 
care, at the benign of the infection, according to Didier Raoult. 

With your personal standards of effectiveness and that of guys like Raoult. 
Personally, I find that anything that doesn't satisfy the standards of 
randomized proper placebo controlled trial (even if for ethical reasons, you 
permit respirators etc. as standard of care for placebo) does not qualify as 
effective beyond doubt. If such trials properly conducted and controlled were 
to prove HCQ as effective, I would change my view.
Sure, if people want to take it with these nuances in mind, then no problem. 
What is concerning is the sense of false hope (and cash extracted from patients 
from drug makers and doctors) in the argumentation that this "really" has 
significant or sufficient effectiveness, when such trials are not completed as 
of today to my knowledge and people remain largely unaware of the 
nuances/degrees of effectiveness. In this kind of uninformed, hysterical 
environment, the argument can be made that Raoult is acting irresponsibly, as 
people are largely unable to differentiate on effectiveness and he uses his 
expert status to advance what is still a personal view until arguably higher 
standards of trials/effectiveness prove or disprove the claim. PGC-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/79488e75-1598-4a56-a69a-bf2cd269b2a2o%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/19925629.910360.1596750766738%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to