On Friday, August 7, 2020 at 2:46:49 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 2:51 PM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The scientific consensus is based on scientific studies, is it not? >> > > Yes. > > *> Every single study <https://c19study.com/> (dozens of them) that >> investigated early and prophylactic use of HCQ showed a benefit, without >> exception.* >> > > A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as Postexposure Prophylaxis for > Covid-19 <https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2016638> > > *> So then, what is the scientific consensus on early/prophylactic use?* > > > *"CONCLUSIONS: After high-risk or moderate-risk exposure to Covid-19, > hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or > confirmed infection when used as postexposure prophylaxis within 4 days > after exposure. [...] Side effects were more common with hydroxychloroquine > than with placebo"* > > John K Clark >
This is my understanding as well, and what I get with the ProMED messages. The internet and digital age has boomeranged on us. There was a promise of there being a world library and a renaissance in facilitating research. Instead, besides the commercial stuff, we have become a world of lies and liars, where alt-realities, pseudo-facts and just plain rot and lies has come dominate things. We are going from the age of enlightenment to endarkenment, where things that are factually false continue to be generated and ardently defended. This is how dark ages start. LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e489234b-c2cb-43ad-86c8-ac0e5007c81en%40googlegroups.com.
