On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:44 AM smitra <[email protected]> wrote: > > FAPP, therefore not well defined at all. Sticking to FAPP you could > never have discovered Special Relativity, General Relativity, found the > correct way to resolve Maxwell's Demon paradox, etc. etc. >
FAPP is well-defined for all practical purposes. That is all that you require for special and general relativity, statistical mechanics, and the rest of physics. You cannot point me to any physical result that is not FAPP -- we have only limited measurement precision, after all. And that is good enough for real-world physics. Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSKqrr0KEg9ZHoOU1z58nsnP%2Bw%3DDFk04apjshzO3Gr7gg%40mail.gmail.com.
