[Philip Benjamin]
     The premise "If "1Infinity" Is the number of odd integers and "2infinity" 
is the number of even integers and   3infinity" is the number of points"  is 
actually "Infinity1 (odd integers) + Infinity2 (even integers) + Infinity3 (odd 
+ even) =  1 Infinity (numbers). Points do not mix with numbers in the same 
frame of reference.
     As for Muhammad, he is a historical fact: 300-700 years of domination in 
Western Europe (from Italy to Spain), still dominant in Eastern and central 
Europe and the old Byzantine Empire, 1000 years in India (eventually the 
British Empire stopped it, India became free from Britain, probably never could 
have from Muslim rulers). There was indeed a "change of consciousness" by 
forced conversions.
      That is not what "transformed" the civilized and erudite Phoenician pagan 
Augustine  (of Greco-Roman roots). It was a free and willing obedience to what 
he considered a "call"  
(https://www.midwestaugustinians.org/conversion-of-st-augustine), through the 
instrumentality of a child's song. Science cannot ignore the facts of history. 
Augustinian transformation of individual consciousness contributed to creating 
an atmosphere for science and technology to develop. Islam forced conversion of 
mathematicians and scientists and artists of an Augustinian ethos. In fact 
European nations would not have explored new ocean routes to the East, if the 
Muslim rulers had not closed the land routes to the East. (Most probably India 
might still have been under Muslim rule). There is a noticeable historical 
difference between "Koranic change" and "Scriptural Quickening or Regeneration" 
of individual consciousness.
       Nafs is an Arabic word used in the Quran, literally meaning "self". I is 
translated as "psyche", "ego" or "soul". In the Quran, the word is used in both 
the individualistic (verse 2:48) and collective sense (verse 4:1). The 
soul/spirit in the Scriptures is always individualistic. As I have mentioned in 
the previous post ancient languages such as Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek and Latin 
have soul/spirit derived from the roots of Breath/breeze. When the last breath 
was gone, life ceased. So the ancients considered soul/spirit of life as 
something akin to wind. Had they known bio dark matter with its chemistry, most 
likely they might have used that instead!!!
      Philip Benjamin

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2021 12:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Falling Outward (was: Words, 
definitions, and Many "Worlds")

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 9:42 AM Philip Benjamin 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

> You are entirely right to sate: "400 years ago Galileo found a way of 
> converting one reference frame to another that worked very well as long as 
> the speeds involved we're not extremely large, and when they were Einstein 
> found a way 100 years ago that could be used to develop an entirely 
> consistent way of converting one reference frame into another that also 
> conformed with all known experimental results". There is no logical fallacy 
> here. The fallacy arises when categories are mixed in the two separate frames 
> of reference.

Your first mistake was using the term "frames of reference" because it's used 
appropriately in physics but not in pure mathematics, such as the study of 
infinity in set theory, and not in philosophy, and you were doing both.

> "Mixing categories" is not "converting reference-frames".  Infinity1 (odd 
> numbers) + Infinity2 (even numbers) + Infinity3 (odd + even)  = 1 Infinity 
> (numbers). The essence here is "numbers".

No, you're still dead wrong. If "1Infinity" Is the number of odd integers and 
"2infinity" is the number of even integers and  "3infinity" is the number of 
points on a line then 1Infinity + 2infinity is NOT equal to the 3infinity 
number.

> To go back to Samiya Illias comment on Koranic [blah blah]

No thanks, I'd rather not go back to the silly myths an obscure iron age tribe 
had 1,400 years ago.  Humanity has been there and done that, it's time to look 
for something better, much better.  With a mountain of important relevant new 
information being discovered every day giving us clues into the nature of 
reality why anybody would be willing to spend one nanosecond studying this 
ancient nonsense is beyond me.
John K Clark      See what's on my new list at  
Extropolis<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fg%2Fextropolis&data=04%7C01%7C%7C8adfff813125465b805208d8d5cdfc00%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637494427954034005%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=YvSy7rdw2fQOvzpb8QZ%2B9liEdgSbGic%2Fq2LC2q%2BNU7k%3D&reserved=0>

.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv06ghhZdaxDrPQoWKQtKpstoXKhFNgA9FhwCg1_Ttooqg%40mail.gmail.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fd%2Fmsgid%2Feverything-list%2FCAJPayv06ghhZdaxDrPQoWKQtKpstoXKhFNgA9FhwCg1_Ttooqg%2540mail.gmail.com%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dfooter&data=04%7C01%7C%7C8adfff813125465b805208d8d5cdfc00%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637494427954034005%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=V5pWnlBhW0bNxNU9kSHS3pmCHxI%2F75%2B0mG8SItS0hlU%3D&reserved=0>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/SA0PR11MB470482BB9F0941D81406E6F3A8839%40SA0PR11MB4704.namprd11.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to