On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 6:27:15 AM UTC-5 Bruno Marchal wrote: > On 3 May 2021, at 17:09, Philip Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Speech by *Senator Tim Scott*: > https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/read-sen-tim-scott-s-speech-rnc-n1237978... > > “ America is not Racist…” > MSNBC host *Tiffany **Cross* made it clear that she was angry with > Scott's characterization of America, saying Scott — the lone black U.S. > senator — has "no sense" and "sounded a stone fool" when he absolved > America of being inherently racist. She misapplies “Stockholm Syndrome” to > an independent, FREE critical thinker. > https://news.yahoo.com/msnbc-tiffany-cross-slams-tim-134742377.html > [*Philip Benjamin*] > If America is racist (because of the global bane of Slave Traffic— > human traffic still vogue), why races of all genera ALWAYS and still want > to emigrate en masse to this once Puritan America? There are “Life issues” > never discussed by Western Acade-Media Pagan(ism) [WAMP]: > > 1 . Is consciousness (life) an ENDOWMENT or EVOLVEMENT in the physical > world of quantum particles of fermions, quarks, dark matter and their > chemistries (Note: 3 below)? If it is an EVOLVEMENT, what was its very > first “*aseitous*progenitor”--- dead electron, proton, neutron or some > combination of them? If it is an ENDOWMENT, who or what is the ENDOWER with > aseity? The answer contributes to human civilizations and makes the > unbridgeable difference between paganism (from the great pagan Egyptian to > Greco Roman civilizations) & non-paganism [Augustinianism from Adonai > (plural) YHWH (singular) Elohim (uni-plural) with Patriarchal, Prophetic > and Apostolic imprimatur] and non-pagan Abrahamic civilizations. > > > 2. Is there any candidate for science today other than bio dark-matter of > negligible mass relative to electrons with bio dark-matter chemistry > (chemical bonds which are spin governed particle configurations of duets > and octets) to describe a real invisible individual “self”? (*See note > 1 below*) > > 3 . Why “Origin” is mentioned only in the Title, not once in the Text, of > Darwin’s Book “On the *Origin* of Species by Means of Natural Selection, > or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life ”. > > 4. Why the racism propagated by the non-evidentialist Darwin is ignored > by the WAMP? Why did he “scientifically” propose to eliminate "the negro > and Australian peoples [*aborigines*]," whom he considered as savages > whose continued survival according to him was hindering the progress of > civilization? ( > http://mwilliams.info/archive/2008/02/the-full-title-of-darwins-on-the-origin-of-species.php > ). > > > > > Because it is very common that the greatest genius are the one saying the > greatest stupidity, especially when applying their ideas too much quickly. > > It is up to us, the readers or students, to filter what is valid from what > is invalid. > > The human problem is that we are Darwinianly programmed, like the wolves, > to believe that … the boss is right. It makes sense in situation of > conflict when decision must be made quickly, and that tell us that humans > have evolved a lot through conflicts with itself. But we can learn from > this, and try to better behave with our pals. > > Bruno >
This is manifested in denial arguments seen around the world. The second Amendment was drafted in order to allow militias to put down slave rebellions. Most of the drafters of the US Constitution were slave holders and most saw little problem with it. Americans have layers of denial on this and related issues. We see this elsewhere, where the Turks refuse to admit the Armenian genocide, Europeans are hesitant to admit their collaborator role with Nazis in WWII, Chinese deny any mal-treatment of Uyghurs and so forth. Darwin was a product of his time, where he was a citizen and upper class to boot in the dominant nation and empire of the world. This was Victorian British Empire period. The default assumption was that Europeans were superior, particularly northern Europeaners and more in England that would be Anglo-Saxon, plus Normans I presume. This does not make his theory wrong. Teichmuller did brilliant work on moduli space of hyperbolic geometries, which I have employed, and the man was an ardent Nazi and even enlisted in the Wehrmacht and died in combat. This does not make his mathematics false, but it does illustrate how he was an asshole. LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ae6289cb-da68-4885-b1a4-76a7d0c27dd5n%40googlegroups.com.
