On 6/4/2021 3:15 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:29 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    /> It's not nearly as thin as the air that says it's a musket.
    It's the obvious functional interpretation. /


I interpret that to mean you don't believe in the "original intent" interpretation.

I'm certainly not wedded to that, but my point is that "original intent" could most reasonably interpret "arms" as whatever soldiers are issued to be in a militia.  It would have swords and shields in 1200ce and assualt rifles in 2021.  In other words interpret it in terms function in the world, not in terms of hardware at the time.


    > /The use of "arms" to mean any weapon is clearly a derivative
    extension of what a combatant originally wielded with his arm.
    /


Well, I admit a linguist would say the weapon meaning of the word "arms" is derived from the word for the limbs human beings used to manipulate things, and a linguist would also say the derivation of the word "calculus" comes from the Greek word for small stone or pebble, but I don't think having completed a study of pebbles will help you much on a calculus exam.

        >> In 1787 the people that made cannons andwarships were called
        arms manufacturers and that hasn't changed.It may be absurd
        but that's the world we live in because nuclear weapons are
        called "arms'', remember the SALT talks from the 1970s, the
        Strategic Arms Limitation Talks? They were about the reduction
        in the number of nuclear weapons manufactured by the US and USSR.


    /> But they certainly didn't mean that in order to have well
    regulated militia people had the right to keep and bear frigates. /


True, it's impossible for one man to carry a frigate, but it's certainly possible for one man to carry and activate a nuclear warhead, so I don't see your point. I'm also surprised to hear you bring up the "well regulated militia" bit because for years courts have been pretending that line didn't exist in the Constitution. The only well regulated militias are state national guard units, and only a tiny percentage of the population are members of the national guard, but there are more privately owned guns in the US than there are people in the country. And even when national guard members are called to duty they don't use their personal guns, they use weapons provided by the state.

It's unclear in the text, but I think the founders were thinking of individuals being called up to form a militia.  That's what happened in putting down the Whisky Rebellion and Shay's Rebellion.  I've proposed that one resolution of the gun control controversy would be for states to charter private militias who would keep track of members guns (say keep them in an armory at a shooting range the way Brits do) and have liability insurance covering their usage.  The state would require that they maintain certain standards of membership.  To make this more attractive to gun nuts, they, thru the militia, could own full-auto and other prohibited individual arms.

Brent


I think the second amendment is the most sloppily written part of the constitution, and that's really saying something considering what a very imperfect document it is. At least the parts about slavery are clear, they're not stupid, they're just evil.

John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>

    ,



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1723kyimuWSppY8U5mhHUoSBsCv4w6n0n9TsfASLO3Bg%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1723kyimuWSppY8U5mhHUoSBsCv4w6n0n9TsfASLO3Bg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4940f8c2-bb50-5c3a-0ef6-1b466313d9bb%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to