Fauci is not helpful in his CDC mission. For instance last year he said he 
change the percentage of what it would take to reach national immunity because 
the felt it would make us feel bad. He said at the time 75%, when he calculated 
it to be 90%. Just tell us the truth. His ties with the Wuhan lab make him 
unsuitable for taking advice from unless you hear it from somebody else more 
trustworthy. You seem to be ignoring science regarding your airplane comment 
because all US passenger airlines require HEPA filters which reduce the changes 
of getting covid that way. 
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-airlines-idINKBN2702S7You 
characterization of Trump supporters is again wrong because everything you look 
for is through an ideological lens. If group loyalty was an Olympic sport, 
you'd have earned a Silver. 
>From the UK, (The Country) which has never liked Yanks, comes this 
>notification. 
>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9847225/Data-shows-NOT-just-Republicans-refusing-COVID-vaccine.html
So, really it's your peeps that are so obstinate and not the hicks from the 
sticks, and your Chief is letting newcomers in from the now open border, and 
they come from places where general medical care is unaffordable, and free 
vaccinations are lacking. 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Aug 3, 2021 5:47 am
Subject: Re: Vaccine statistics

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:09 PM spudboy100 via Everything List 
<[email protected]> wrote:


> Pro-vaccine here, but am against vaxing an masks as some sort of loyalty oath

If you think it's OK for unvaccinated and unmasked people to get on an airplane 
filled with 300 people, do you also think someone has a God-given right to 
defecate in the aisle of that closed aluminum tube flying at 35,000 feet if 
they wish to?  

 > For a year the idea of covid being a naturally evolved germ was promoted 
solidly by the CDC, the WHO, and progressives that comprise the media and most 
governments. This is now looking doubtful with the rise of delta and now other 
variants

How do you figure that? Life changes over generations, a fellow wrote a 
bestseller about that in 1859 named Charles Darwin. A generation is only about 
20 minutes long for a virus so they change rapidly.  And COVID-19 is a RNA 
virus which mutates more frequently than DNA viruses so they evolve even 
faster. Although there are exceptions generally they become more infectious but 
less deadly because a parasite killing its host is not a good Evolutionary 
strategy. 

> From a new report from Nature. 
Rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and vaccination impact the fate of 
vaccine-resistant strains
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3

If you hadn't given that link I would have because it says:  
 "As expected, we found that a fast rate of vaccination decreases the 
probability of emergence of a resistant strain."

> Potentially we are now breeding resistance. Is this true?

Yes, that has always been a danger, but the article points out there are things 
that society can do to minimize that risk:  
 "Counterintuitively, when a relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions 
happened at a time when most individuals of the population have already been 
vaccinated the probability of emergence of a resistant strain was greatly 
increased."
In other words, filthy unhygienic unscientific unvaccinated people (nearly all 
Trump supporters) put all of us, and the entire nation, and the entire world, 
in danger. Not only is refusing to wear a mask even at the height of the 
pandemic and now refusing to get vaccinated unethical, but much more important 
than morality to a flag waiver like you, it's UNPATRIOTIC. 30% of the 
population (mostly Republicans) refuse to get vaccinated, if they don't change 
their minds then the days of the USA being a economic military and scientific 
superpower are over. You can't have a first class nation if it's anchored down 
by 30% of its population which is second rate.

> The China origin thing,

If we're talking about the pros and cons of vaccinations (actually there aren't 
any cons) then the origin of the virus is irrelevant 

 > Fauci's own decision to change his analysis from a 90% immunity percentile 
 > down to 75%, because he stated he "thought that the public couldn't take 
 > it," throws whatever people like him say, into reasonable doubt. 

Interesting factoid, I googled the phrase you quoted "thought that the public 
couldn't take it", and I got exactly one hit, your post, that's it. Bing did no 
better. 

> Fauci's connection with funding the Wuhan labs

I don't know if the Wuhan lab had anything to do with the origin of COVID-19 or 
not, it's conceivable an accident may have happened, but at least publicly it 
was not doing anything that every other virus research lab in the world, 
including those in the USA, wasn't doing. And as it was one of the top virus 
research laboratories in the world and Dr. Fauci was one of the top virus 
disease researchers in the world it would be astonishing if you could NOT find 
a connection between him and the Wuhan lab.  As for the funding, back in 2015 
the national Institute of health gave $3 million to a nonprofit called the 
"EcoHealth Alliance" to study bat-borne coronaviruses, the EcoHealth Alliance 
then sent $76,000 to the Wuhan lab as a subcontract. I don't see anything 
particularly sinister in any of this, but I must say, attacks on Dr. Fauci for 
following the science and not Trump's happy talk (the virus is totally under 
control) is nauseating. Dr. Fauci has been risking his life by treating highly 
infectious patients that have deadly diseases for decades, can you imagine 
Donald Trump caring for an Ebola patient? He'd be running away as fast as his 
fat little legs could carry him. 

 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
lxxo


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0XA1k9Avf-c9KHcv-EKUf6bs9JD%2B9wGgEQe%2Ba1jppX5g%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1803896404.45263.1628221766433%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to