On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:50 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

> *More significantly is the analysis by a physicist not on time as a
> quantum feature of the cosmos, this estimate by a British mathematician.
> This study only focused on the readily detected luminous matter. This based
> on the Eddington-analysis of originally 10^80. I haven't read where the
> Math guy Vopson in any case used the more recent Beckenstein Bound of
> 10^123? *
>
> There are 6×10^80 Bits of Information in the Observable Universe
>
> https://www.universetoday.com/153035/there-are-6x1080-bits-of-information-in-the-observable-universe/
>
> Since entropy is increasing, is the information that comprises reality,
> reducing? Is Dyson's big push simply a fade-out?
>


*Interesting idea, thank you.Of course it's all based on the assumption
that the Bekenstein Bound actually exists, and that is based on the
assumption that space and time are not only quantized (come in individual
little chunks) but are quantized at one very specific level, and that is
based on the assumption that quantum mechanics as we know it today is
absolutely true which we know can't be the case because it can say nothing
about gravity and there is exactly zero experimental evidence that
spacetime is actually quantized.*


*Recently on the Extropolis List somebody asked if it was physically
possible for a universe to be better than this one, I said I didn't know
but if there is a best of all possible worlds it was one in which the
Bekenstein Bound was not the law of the land and thus an infinite number of
calculations can be made in a finite amount of time by a computer of finite
size.*

 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
bex

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv221vCWO%3DGSgrgpTpz0Omp7GpLcdR3dy898ao8DRHeXsQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to