No, a fusion rocket is much more technologically difficult than a fusion power plant.  The power plant can be very large and heavy. The power plant just need to produce heat; the rocket needs to direct the fusion products.

Brent

On 1/15/2022 8:55 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:

So earlier today I watched Sabine hassenfelder the physicist from Germany indicate that any kind of wormhole travel or FTL is strictly unlikely. What I'd like to ask is, whether all the work that's done today for creating commercial nuclear fusion is more or less likely, than using the same technology to develop fusion plasma rockets to travel much more swiftly within the solar system? Our fusion plasma rockets the lower hanging fruit, versus commercial nuclear fusion? Thanks!



------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Saturday, January 15, 2022 Lawrence Crowell <everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:

It is possible for a binary star system to interact with a third star so there is an exchange.  We do normally expect binary star systems to have similarly oriented angular momenta.

 This is an interesting result. To compute this would have been tough. This is a case of a Robinson-Trautman twisting solution or a twisting type N. The addition of the two angular momenta results in the occurrence of angular momenta perpendicular to the initial angular momenta. This can be seen in with the classical group [L_i, L_j] = ε_{ijk}|L|^2 n_k, for n_k a unit vector. This means there is the emission of angular momentum in the gravitational radiation. The calculation was most likely done numerically.

LC


On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 1:13:02 PM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:

    On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:37 PM Brent Meeker <meeke...@gmail.com>
    wrote:


        /> Kudos to whomever did the calculation for this.  But I
        would have thought that most collisions would be misaligned in
        both spin axes and impact plane.  The Sun's spin axis isn't
        aligned with the Milky Way's axis of rotation, so I had
        assumed most stars have randomly directed spin axes./


    Stars do have random axis of rotations in general but not if
    you're talking about double stars, and the sun is rather unusual
    in being only a single star, most stars are double stars, and they
    were created at the same time from the same rotating cloud of gas
    and dust and thus have similar axis of rotation, so when the
    resulting stars turned into Black Holes they would also have
    similar axes. And indeed most of the Black Hole mergers so far
    detected by gravitational waves have been of that sort, but not
    this one, that's what makes it so unusual. This system must've
    been formed by two stars that formed at different places at
    different times but then got close together and somehow went into
    orbit around each other.

    John K Clark    See what's on my new list at Extropolis
    <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
    qbj


        Brent

        On 1/13/2022 3:49 AM, John Clark wrote:
        For the first time a sort of gravitational wave rocket has
        been found. By re-examining the data from the LIGO and Virgo
        gravitational wave observatories researchers report on
        January 6 they have detected the merger of 34 and 29 solar
        mass Black Holes that resulted in a Black Hole of about 62
        solar masses with about one solar mass being converted into
        gravitational waves. What makes this merger unusual is that
        it was not symmetrical, the axis of spin of the 2 black holes
        were not aligned with each other and neither was aligned with
        the axis of orbit around each other. This would indicate that
        the 2 stars that form them (assuming these 2 large Black
        Holes were actually formed from the corpses of dead stars)
        were not born in an isolated system but probably came from a
        denser environment like a globular cluster. Even more
        interesting is that the misalignment of the spins means that
        the gravitational waves emitted were not emitted
        symmetrically, and gravitational waves carry some linear
        momentum. So the resulting 62 Solar mass Black Hole must've
        received a pretty substantial kick causing it to move pretty
        fast, and that's just what the researchers found, because of
        that kick the huge 62 solar mass Black Hole started moving at
        least 700 km a second and probably closer to 1500.  It's
        probably moving fast enough to escape whatever galaxy it was in.

        Evidence of large recoil velocity from a black hole merger
        signal <https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.01302.pdf>


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/90e5c40b-a4eb-4ef0-a711-da7f9406e91dn%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/90e5c40b-a4eb-4ef0-a711-da7f9406e91dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2065769616.377315.1642308956296%40mail.yahoo.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2065769616.377315.1642308956296%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/15a06947-0459-36cd-f0b5-7f924e2afdc2%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to