On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 1:54:36 AM UTC+3 Bruce wrote:

we now know that MWI is inconsistent with any sensible interpretation of 
> probability; strict MWI is inconsistent with the Born rule.

Dittos!!! At least, mostly.

What do you mean "we now know"? Any citations, pretty please?

I gather that by "strict MWI" you mean without FAPP. I argue that since we 
regard QM-without-collapse as a workable theory, we have to introduce FAPP 
(more precisely, moral certainty regarding a given purpose) and 
consequently the Born Rule.

In another thread I insist that we must swallow the pill of no-probability 
for single outcomes, and build a decision theory on that. (Yes, we can!) 
>From QM we obtain only the Born Rule for large enough samples.

George K.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to