On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 11:54:42 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 1:42 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *>>> You referenced Sean's blog, which I assume you affirm. He claims that 
>>>> on each split, each universe has half the energy of the prior split, where 
>>>> each has a probability of .5. So the total energy of anything within a 
>>>> split, including the record you want to keep, reduces on each split. 
>>>> Pretty 
>>>> soon it will be unreadable. AG  *
>>> *>> For Darwin's sake!! * I've already answered that criticism several 
>>> times, if you want to challenge what I said with a logical argument then 
>>> fine, but don't just keep repeating the same damn thing over and over again 
>>> like a parrot.
>> *> You made the claim that energy is not conserved in GR *
> *Yes.*
> *>  I definitely recall that. But what Sean says is something else as far 
>> as I can tell.  Do you dispute that? AG*
> *I'll be damned if I'm gonna rehash what I already said yet again! If you 
> have short-term memory loss, as you apparently do, then reread what I 
> already wrote and then quickly ask a specific question you think I did not 
> address properly before you forget what I wrote again.*

You don't have to rehash it. Just copy and paste it again, if it really 
supports what you claim. I also recall that Bruce, who's not a lightweight 
on this topic, strongly objected to Sean's claim, which is as I just 
posted; that there's no energy loss in the MWI; rather, energy already 
existing is split among the branches according to Born's rule. AG

> John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
> stm

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to