On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:04 PM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because that >> is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact. >> > > *> The axiom that additional trials in this world,* > No world can have more than one trial because if many worlds is correct each trial splits a world. *> result in additional outcomes in the SAME OTHER worlds.* > I don't understand this axiom at all but no matter; I don't see why ANY additional axiom is needed as long as you have the Schrodinger equation and the Born rule. > Only if those outcomes are in the same other world, can you apply a > frequentist approach to experimentally infer Born's rule. > There is no need to get in into philosophy at all to infer the Born rule because the Born rule just works. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> nbt e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2pGQVSZ5WYgnFqsoWgTxzuHzWmA%3D0nnzBOJ1qFKYHEuA%40mail.gmail.com.
