Solar done at 20-30 years means we either got fusion, or solar has failed .
-----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Jun 30, 2022 8:46 am Subject: An example of environmentalist non-seriousness This quote is from today's issue of the New York Times, it's about a company called BlueWave that has found a way to use the same land for both farming and solar cell electrical production, and environmentalists oppose the idea of course: "chapters of the Audubon nonprofit environmental organization have been vocal about the technology’s potential effect on wildlife. Michelle Manion, the vice president of policy and advocacy for Mass Audubon (which is not affiliated with the National Audubon Society), said that while her organization supported renewable energy, including solar within farming operations, “we want to maximize the placement of ground-mounted solar on some of our lands that are the least ecologically sensitive first.” And there are general concerns that even with dual-use solar panels, arable land may be lost, though BlueWave says that the land can be reverted to pure agriculture uses once the solar leases — typically 20 to 30 years — expire." John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis 961 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0uhAEghZS1RT0KpoKNvFCLaohAkyht6Br2bkrLwWpWag%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1949213793.277510.1656717167335%40mail.yahoo.com.
