First, develop quantum computing into a fine art. Then, fire up all 
Interossiters, and ignite the Bussard Ramjets to full capacity!! 
Then, invoke K. Eric Drexler, strength, Nanofabrication to maximum velocity!! 
In this fashion, we'll manufacture carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, into 
all material products made! With the savings from these, we'll invest in 
Martian Real estate futures (excluding Phobos & Deimos), 
Yeah Buddy, weese all rich now!
Actually, my blathering has one advantage over shitcoin. That is, if we 
magically, achieved K. Eric Drexler's nanomanufacturing, it would be an actual 
material thing, like a solar cell, or a bushel of sugar beets. Something 
material. 
The only thing the Coin does is consume electricity in sizable amounts. 


-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, Jul 31, 2022 3:42 pm
Subject: Re: The collapse of bitcoin

On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 2:20 PM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:


> a single honest one can run the network.

So bitcoin can avoid problems if they can just find somebody that everybody 
agrees is a saint. But you could say the same thing about the US dollar if 
everybody agreed that the Chairman of the Federal Reserve is a saint. 

> But my point is the energy requirements are not part of any inherent part of 
> the protocol nor is there any inherent computational difficulty in validation 
> the chain or transactions. The only high cost is the one the protocol adds 
> for the explicit purpose of throttling new blocks to 1 every 10 minutes. If 
> there are fewer miners, this cost is reduced by the protocol. If there were 
> only 100 miners running on lower power laptops, this cost would be no more 
> than the cost of powering these 100 laptops.

If there were only 100 laptops mining for Bitcoins and I joined as the 101st 
then I could make a lot of Bitcoins on my laptop, and if I spent a few thousand 
dollars more to get a computer a few times more powerful than a typical laptop 
I could make even more. There will never be more than 21,000,000 Bitcoins so if 
the world switched over entirely to Bitcoin then each one would be worth a 
little more than 1/21 millionth of the world's economy, and because of 
technological improvements the world's economy will increase, so the amount of 
stuff you can buy with one Bitcoin will increase, so the incentive to mine 
Bitcoins and waste huge amounts of energy will also increase. 
 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
kqx
e-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3%2BGV7Boqq2k%2B6aQ%3DbWEG1NDFcje4rwEuPS5dbyY2PurA%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/951216051.2549107.1659308167935%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to