On 8/14/2022 2:51 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

        > This is the layperson’s definition of freedom and the
definition used to establish legal responsibility in court.

    Yes, and that is why the legal system is such aridiculous
    incoherent mess. There could be no other outcome if something is
    based on pure nonsense.


The legal system might be a mess, but at least in principle it's a good idea not to punish people who didn't do it, did it under coercion, or didn't know what they were doing because they were dementing, for example.

The legal standard makes sense in compatibilist terms.  One's decisions are due one's physical makeup that encodes experience and education.  Observing and learning that people are punished for illegal actions counts as experience and education and so may influence one's decisions.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6d74a67b-7115-4a61-5bee-38724b88cbe2%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to