If you are so inefficiently wired, how come you can comment on the inefficiency 
of the system? Aren’t you an emergent property of the same system that you are 
criticising? 



> On 14-Mar-2023, at 5:49 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:31 AM Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>> > One of the authors of the article says "It’s interesting that the 
>>>> > computer-science field is converging onto what evolution has 
>>>> > discovered", he said that because it turns out that 41% of the fly 
>>>> > brain's neurons are in recurrent loops that provide feedback to other 
>>>> > neurons that are upstream of the data processing path, and that's just 
>>>> > what we see in modern AIs like ChatGPT.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > I do not think this is true. ChatGPT is a fine-tuned Large Language Model 
>>> > (LLM), and LLMs use a transformer architecture, which is deep but purely 
>>> > feed-forward, and uses attention heads. The attention mechanism was the 
>>> > big breakthrough back in 2017, that finally enabled the training of such 
>>> > big models:
>> 
>> I was under the impression that transformers are superior to recurrent 
>> neural networks because recurrent processing of data was not necessary with 
>> transformers so more paralyzation is possible than with recursive neural 
>> networks; it can analyze an entire sentence at once and doesn't need to do 
>> so word by word.  So Transformers learn faster and need less trading data.
>> 
>> > My intuition is that if we are going to successfully imitate biology we 
>> > must model the various neurotransmitters.
> 
> That is not my intuition. I see nothing sacred in hormones, I don't see the 
> slightest reason why they or any neurotransmitter would be especially 
> difficult to simulate through computation, because chemical messengers are 
> not a sign of sophisticated design on nature's part, rather it's an example 
> of Evolution's bungling. If you need to inhibit a nearby neuron there are 
> better ways of sending that signal then launching a GABA molecule like a 
> message in a bottle thrown into the sea and waiting ages for it to diffuse to 
> its random target.
> 
> I'm not interested in brain chemicals, only in the information they contain, 
> if somebody wants  information to get transmitted from one place to another 
> as fast and reliablely as possible, nobody would send smoke signals if they 
> had a fiber optic cable. The information content in each molecular message 
> must be tiny, just a few bits because only about 60 neurotransmitters such as 
> acetylcholine, norepinephrine and GABA are known, even if the true number is 
> 100 times greater (or a million times for that matter) the information 
> content of each signal must be tiny. Also, for the long range stuff, exactly 
> which neuron receives the signal can not be specified because it relies on a 
> random process, diffusion. The fact that it's slow as molasses in February 
> does not add to its charm.  
> 
> If your job is delivering packages and all the packages are very small, and 
> your boss doesn't care who you give them to as long as they're on the correct 
> continent, and you have until the next ice age to get the work done, then you 
> don't have a very difficult profession.  Artificial neurons could be made to 
> communicate as inefficiently as natural ones do by releasing chemical 
> neurotransmitters if anybody really wanted to, but it would be pointless when 
> there are much faster, and much more reliable, and much more specific ways of 
> operating.
> 
> John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
> kuh
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv089oC%3DAc-DswW5simNfWzQsGAZADjusaWOacE4M6kt9g%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7E212EF5-8533-484A-AA62-BEF352C9C1D4%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to