I have found 2 mistakes it has made. It has caught me on a few errors as well. GPT-4 has a vast database it can access. It clearly can reference a fair number of theories, papers and authors. It is a very good emulator of intelligence. It also is proving to be a decent first check on my work. It might be said it passes some criterion for Turing tests, though I have often thought this idea was old fashioned in a way.
LC On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 6:50:33 AM UTC-5 John Clark wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 8:10 PM Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I spent some time on GPT-4 this afternoon. I wrote about a topic that >> was leading to an inference I had made. Before I wrote on that inference >> GPT made the same inference. > > > Wow! Would I be correct in saying that you gave GPT-4 your own personal > Turing Test and it passed because you couldn't tell if you were conversing > with a machine or a human being with *at least* average intelligence? > > John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis > <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> > 8yh > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f0dbf5db-59c3-4c0a-875c-073b998e34f2n%40googlegroups.com.
