The liberal Supremes joined the MAGAts in dodging responsibility. Were
Confederate officers who previously served in the US Army denied
election one-by-one by acts of Congress? I don't think so. Why is any
"action" needed unless someone challenges their disqualification on
factual grounds.
Brent
On 3/4/2024 11:40 AM, Dylan Distasio wrote:
Even if we allow for the sake of a hypothetical that Trump directly
was part of an "insurrection," states have no authority to make this
determination around eligibility under the 14th amendment. The
ruling was unanimous including from liberals on the court who despise
Trump, and does nothing to ignore the 14th amendment which I'm sure
John actually realizes. He just doesn't like the outcome so we've
moved on to the hyperbole phase. Whether Trump was actually guilty
of insurrection is a moot point from a legal perspective in ruling on
a state taking this kind of action. It would have to come from
Congress. The Constitution has not been violated here and everyone
should feel good that the SCOTUS put personal feelings aside, and did
their job.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 2:16 PM howardmarks <howardma...@doitnow.com>
wrote:
Sorry, Supreme Court did not ignore the 14th Amendment to the USC.
How can it be construed as "insurrection" to ask a group not at
the Capitol, words to the effect of "peacefully" going to the
Capital to "lawfully protest . . . "? And, it's doubtful 2nd
Amendment will be allowed by the owners of 300 million guns in the
US to be ignored.
On 3/4/2024 12:58 PM, John Clark wrote:
Now that the Supreme Court has decreed that it's constitutional
to ignore the 14th amendment to the US Constitutionand allow
Trump to remain on the ballot, would it also be constitutional to
ignore the second amendment to the Constitution?
John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
4It
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2P5WvhDJg_SEmo0Yp9Q55pWBBi-t5AhFbPSDuQJp%2BzaQ%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2P5WvhDJg_SEmo0Yp9Q55pWBBi-t5AhFbPSDuQJp%2BzaQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c36e2f6c-2028-405e-8aff-3f555194ac5b%40doitnow.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c36e2f6c-2028-405e-8aff-3f555194ac5b%40doitnow.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJrqPH9tzmLkvFRdUVs765OBpGS6r4AESsJa9q72uRhAgM4dFA%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJrqPH9tzmLkvFRdUVs765OBpGS6r4AESsJa9q72uRhAgM4dFA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/226808d9-362c-4b16-ad49-773102b0757b%40gmail.com.
