Thanks, Russell. Bruno tried to explain this to me a while ago but I 
probably didn't take it all in. Am I right in thinking this has something 
to do with "no oracles" - that is, reality contains no sources of infinite 
unpredictable data? A naked signularity would presumably count as an 
oracle, while it appears any area of space-time contains finite data (the 
Deckenstein bound?) - does that make it Turing complete, in principle? Or 
am I talking nonsense?

On Thursday 12 September 2024 at 18:39:30 UTC+12 Russell Standish wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 09:40:32PM -0700, Liz R wrote:
> > Well, exactly. It's Peano or whatever, so a small subset. Bruno and 
> Tegmark
> > have this idea - I find Tegmark easier to follow personally - that 
> because
> > physics is possibly isomorphic to some set of equations that describe 
> reality,
> > Occam suggests that we don't actually need reality to exist, only the
> > equations.
> >
>
> It is more that whatever foundational basis of reality is, so long as
> it is Turing complete, a computationlist mind cannot distinguish it
> from any other Turing complete substrate. It is almost assuredly not
> the reality we see. In another sense, our reality supervenes on all
> possible universal Turing machines. The question of what is the
> foundational reality has no answer - epistemologically equivalent to
> asking how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
>
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Principal, High Performance Coders [email protected]
> http://www.hpcoders.com.au
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/bf2be45c-10ab-4949-98c7-dc01583c8ff5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to