On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:14 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

*> Ostensibly, applying SR, Bob concludes Alice's clock is running slower
> than his, and vice-versa for Alice*


*Yes.*

*> so you conclude Alice get Bob's response to her question before she
> sends it.*


*No. Watching somebody's Clock that is running slower than your clock does
NOT mean you are observing their time running backwards.  *

*> Obviously, there's a major problem here and I suspect it's related to
> your interpretation of relative clock rates in SR.*


*It's odd, no doubt about it, but it causes no physical paradoxes IF
nothing can travel through space faster than the speed of light. Space
itself can move at any speed without producing paradoxes. If there existed
particles that moved through space faster than the speed of light**
(called Tachyons
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon> ) and it was possible for us to
interact with them, then causality would be violated. And if Bob and Alice
used tachyons instead of light photons to observe then they would see the
others clock moving backwards, not just slowing down.  And you'd be able to
observe and even kill your grandfather 10 years before he met your
grandmother, and you'd have to deal with all the paradoxes that would
produce. But as far as we can tell Tachyons do not exist. *



> *> I can't say exactly what's the problem with your interpretation of
> relative clock rates. Nor do I understand what this has to do with the
> viability of MW.*


*I was just making the point that if Tachyons existed (and I do NOT think
they do) then the only way I can think of to resolve the grandfather
paradox is through Many Worlds. If you or anybody else can think of another
way to resolve it I'm all ears.  *

*John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
<https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
deq

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv33_zd4Rs2HQhMZnxQS2EC%2BDe2%2BraCvCw-hk30rnXZ5WA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to