The was equation was already derived from Maxwell's equations. The
pemeability and permitivity of the vacuum determined the speed. It's
perfectly natural to suppose that there is no such thing as motion
relative the vacuum (to nothing). So the speed of light in vacuo is a
constant.
Brent
On 10/28/2024 6:53 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
When the luminiferous aether was rejected as non-existing, how was EM
wave motion explained? AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1c70b0e2-0556-4f48-a6c5-22ba26ce150bn%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1c70b0e2-0556-4f48-a6c5-22ba26ce150bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3a1b011d-14f0-4211-b5a2-f4126c5285e2%40gmail.com.
