On 11/14/2024 8:53 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
*You just can't get away from binary choices. Don't you ever think of NOT drawing a conclusion until there is sufficient evidence, of never jumping to a conclusion.On Thursday, November 14, 2024 at 3:00:35 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: On 11/14/2024 11:49 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:For Brent: IF, as you acknowledge, that a mystery remainsI did NOT acknowledge that. You seem deliberately obtuse. These "mysteries" are "solved" by familiarity. If you feel Bell experiments are mysterious I challenge you to name some possible solution to the mystery. Brent Your words; "I didn't say there's "no mystery".Which is not equivalent to "there is a mystery" except in your unscientific world where there is never suspension of belief.*The contra-positive of your statement "I didn't say there's "no mystery" " is equivalent to, I think, "I said there is a mystery"; or if not, the latter is a reasonable inference. But regardless, you're entitled to a Nobel in the Philosophy of Science, insofar as you invented a new scientific method! Specifically, if you're uncomfortable with interpreting a theory, and later, after thinking about it a lot and becoming comfortable, you can claim the theory is true. *
Brent* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/dc77b568-84c0-4793-9bbb-8807889414af%40gmail.com.
