*When they started doing Bell experiments, around 1970, the results puzzled 
the experimenters. AG*


*I call B.S. on that.  Anybody who believed QM was correct got exactly what 
they expected.  Bell thought his experiment would prove that hidden 
variable theories were right.  What's your reference?*


*So Bell was wrong in his expectations because he didn't believe in QM? Is 
that your claim now? More important, since you previously acknowledged that 
some mystery remains despite what some vector in Hilbert space indicates, 
what exactly is the content of that mystery? TY, AG *

*Note that they had Hilbert space for a candidate explanation, but clearly 
didn't find it sufficient. Then they tried to close ostensible loopholes,*




*Those were loop holes that would have allowed communication between the 
Alice and Bob measurements, whereas the QM prediction was independent of 
communication.  That's why it was important to close the loop holes. Brent * 

* such as the usual causality by information being transferred at light 
speed. But the puzzling result persisted, so they did experiments where a 
pair of entangled entities were separated beyond causal distance. Why so 
great efforts to close loopholes when they had those Hilbert space vectors, 
which according to you, Brent, solves the problem "exactly"? What do you 
know, that generations of experimenters had no knowledge of? AG*


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a8743590-c5f2-4a0d-80e9-b6ccd656d5e8n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to