On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 9:01:23 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
On 11/22/2024 6:42 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 6:21:18 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote: I recommend the lectures of Jacob Barandes. He has developed an interpretation of QM which shows how QM is related to classical stochastic processes and which avoids the problems I see in other interpretations. He makes a distinction between ontic and epistemic layers in the interpretations which I think clarifies things a lot. "A New Formulation of Quantum Theory" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sshJyD0aWXg "New Foundations for Quantum Theory" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB16TzHFvj0 "Why We Shouldn't Believe in Hilbert Spaces Anymore" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmaSAG4J6nw Of course there are also papers on the same topic: The Stochastic-Quantum Theorem arXiv:2309.03085 The Stochastic-Quantum Correspondence arxiv:2302.10778 The Minimal Modal Interpretation of Quantum Theory arXiv:1405.6755 Brent *Ontic? Is any equation ontic? Have you tried to kick one? AG* Where did I say an equation was ontic? Check your eye sight. Brent I meant to write equation or theory. What's your favorite ontic theory if you have one? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3af2eb90-def8-47b0-80cd-da6dd22ded07n%40googlegroups.com.
