On 11/22/2024 6:42 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2024 at 6:21:18 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:
I recommend the lectures of Jacob Barandes. He has developed an
interpretation of QM which shows how QM is related to classical
stochastic processes and which avoids the problems I see in other
interpretations. He makes a distinction between ontic and
epistemic layers in the interpretations which I think clarifies
things a lot.
"A New Formulation of Quantum Theory"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sshJyD0aWXg
"New Foundations for Quantum Theory"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB16TzHFvj0
"Why We Shouldn't Believe in Hilbert Spaces Anymore"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmaSAG4J6nw
Of course there are also papers on the same topic:
The Stochastic-Quantum Theorem arXiv:2309.03085
The Stochastic-Quantum Correspondence arxiv:2302.10778
The Minimal Modal Interpretation of Quantum Theory arXiv:1405.6755
Brent
*Ontic? Is any equation ontic? Have you tried to kick one? AG*
Where did I say an equation was ontic? Check your eye sight.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/78acb1ff-c7e8-4c02-aefa-e5e72a64fe76%40gmail.com.
