On 12/18/2024 2:40 PM, John Clark wrote:


On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:

    //
    /There seems to be an ambiguity in "one and only one state".  In
    the experiment there is a single Hilbert space vector describing a
    neutron which travels both paths.  So does "one and only one
    state" really mean one and only one classical state?/


*If an object can be in more than one state at the same time *
My question is about what "one state" means.  A superposition in one basis is a single state in another basis.
*
*
*then obviously that object cannot be a classical object. And since, as far as we know, everything can be put into more than one state at the same time, reality can not be classical.
*
What if each object is always in only one state, it's just not always a state we have a yes/no measurement for?  Is L-G just showing that here's an example for which we didn't think of a yes/no measurement.  Or is it that here's an example for which there's a measurement that's not yes/no

Brent

***John K Clark   See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>*
efp

    On 12/18/2024 11:45 AM, John Clark wrote:
    Incidentally, if we're interested in reality, wondering if an
    object was in one and only one state before it was measured, then
    we should really be talking about the Leggett-Garg Inequality not
    Bell because it's a generalization of Bell's Inequality that was
    specifically designed to test reality. Very recently
    experimenters have found that like Bell Leggett-Garg is also
    violated. I wrote about that back in July and I repeat it now:
    =====
    *

    Reality says that a macroscopic object exists in one and only one
    state regardless of if it has been observed or not.**In 1985
    Anthony Leggett and Anupam Garg published an inequality that
    MUST be less than or equal to 1 if reality was true. It's similar
    to Bell's Inequality but Bell was about the relationship between
    two entangled particles, but Leggett-Garg is about if a
    microscopic object can be in more than one state at the same
    instant in time.*
    *
    *
    *In the June 24, 2024 issue of the journal Physical Review
    Letters, physicists tested the Leggett-Garg Inequality in an
    experiment with neutron beams, and they got a value of 1.20 +-
    0.007. That is larger than 1. The Leggett-Garg inequality is
    violated. Reality is untrue.*
    *
    *
    *Violation of a Leggett-Garg Inequality Using Ideal Negative
    Measurements in Neutron Interferometry*
    <https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.260201>

    *In their experiment they generated an intense neutron beam and
    then, using a perfect silicon crystal, they split it into two
    beams several centimeters apart. Then, using another crystal, the
    two beams are re-combine back in the one beam and then hit the
    detector. Each beam is made up of many millions of neutrons and
    thus is huge by quantum standards, and there are two ways the
    neutrons can travel from the source to the detector. *
    *
    *
    *The lead researcher says "_The idea that maybe the neutron is
    only traveling on one of the two paths, we just don’t know which
    one” has thus been refuted_." Mathematically there is simply no
    way the behavior of those neutrons can be explained by any
    conceivable macroscopically realistic theory.*
    *
    *
    *Incidentally, Many Worlds is _NOT_ a realistic theory.*
    *
    *

    trn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2fL15TT6Y9-_yGTbvFQ4A4HGLDErhCac4b68G23mtx1w%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2fL15TT6Y9-_yGTbvFQ4A4HGLDErhCac4b68G23mtx1w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b9da1268-ad78-4b83-8294-eead58b8e009%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to