On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:00 PM Brent Meeker <meekerbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/21/2025 11:03 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> If amplitude plays no role in observer distribution, then why does the >> Born rule hold? > > * > The squared amplitude determines the relative frequency of results in > repeated trials. * > *That doesn't answer Quentin's question. You're just repeating the definition of the Born Rule, and everyone agrees it works, but some of us would like to know WHY it works and WHY it's even necessary given the fact that Schrodinger's equation is deterministic but others, such as yourself, are content to just shut up and calculate. To each their own. * *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* csu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2ui-DTLCimwHUi_3w0_PQ_JZC95jDOardco_3GUz--ZA%40mail.gmail.com.
