On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 18:57 +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > As evolution obviously depends on libedataserver already, surely for the > files which are identical there is no problem at all?
My thoughts exactly. I couldn't control myself, sorry, and went ahead with one of the duplicates: I changed the inclusions of e-time-utils.h in evolution end evolution-exchange to include it from libedataserver instead, and committed. Now the evolution copy of e-time-utils.h can be dropped from being installed. Presumably we can drop e-time-utils.c also from the sources of libeutil, or does Evo need to maintain 100% ABI compatibility in its shared libraries between releases? Is there 3rd-party code (plugins) in the wild that would expect to find these entry points in the libeutil shared library? I think it would be fine to just go ahead with changes like this that are obviously right and don't affect code behaviour, instead of waiting for discussion and approval which might never appear. --tml _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolutionfirstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers