On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 09:28 -0400, Chris Toshok wrote:
> No opinion on the rest of the patch, but this:
>
> > +static void
> > +free_token (gchar *token)
> > +{
> > + gint i=0;
> > + gboolean no=FALSE;
> > +
> > + for (i=0; (i < tokens_len); i++)
> > + {
> > + if (tokens[i] == token)
> > + no = TRUE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!no)
> > + g_free (token);
> > +}
> > +
>
> is more efficient as:
>
> static void
> free_token (gchar *token)
> {
> gint i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < tokens_len; i ++)
> if (tokens[i] == token)
> return;
out of curiosity, the first patch reads through the list
and this patch, return if any one of the token is equal, anf not any
following it.
Would the below not be better ?
for (i = 0; i < tokens_len; i ++)
if (tokens[i] == token)
break;
--
Ritesh Khadgaray
LinuX N Stuff
Ph: +919822394463
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.
_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
