Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 11:01 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz a écrit : > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +0000, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > > > > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > > > I've seen that too, but the point was more: "Why are the message view > > > > > headers looking different than every other ETable I can see in > > > > > evolution ?". I've looked at different themes and it was always > > > > > different. I'm not an expert in GtkWidget hacking but can't we > > > > > "inherit" > > > > > some properties from regular list headers ? > > > > > > > > Different in what sense? I see that message-list is not consistent with > > > > GtkTreeview but so as is the other memo/task list. Im sorry, I'm not > > > > getting it. > > > > > > See attachements: > > > - in mail view, even if it's not perfect it looks like a GtkTreeView > > > header > > > - in memo view, the header looks like a button > > > > > > This is even more flagrant with the Glossy theme. > > > > Frankly, for me with Industrial, it looks the same in both places. > > For me, it looks like Gilles. I have a clearlooks-based theme. I'd > guess it's engine related? > > Daniel > indeed, for reference (and non pgo readers): http://abock.org/2007/07/02/suboptimal-theming-in-gtk/ http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2007/07/04/re-suboptimal-theming-in-gtk/
long story short, ETree needs special handling of the gtk-engine to be drawn in a way that makes it look like a GtkTreeView and even then, it is very possible it won't be perfect. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
