Hi Matthew :) On mié, 2008-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:59 +0100, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote: > > I'm not sure about which solution is best, and probably the "%x" > > solution is easier and will do the right job. If that's the case, I can > > try to change the sources so strftime uses "%x" and not hardcoded > > combinations of "%d" and "%m". > > Using "%x" and "%X" sounds like the right way. Please do, and submit > your patches to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ for review.
Since I'm not familiar with the po files (I don't know if I can modify them directly or not) and so the work may take some time, agains which version should I make my patches? Latest stable? Latest devel? Latest SVN? Any preference? BTW, I have to set up an accout at the gnome bugzilla... I'll try to have some patch by tomorrow evening. Raúl "DervishD" Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen! We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ... _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers