Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 13:17 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:59 +0100, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
> > I'm not sure about which solution is best, and probably the "%x"
> > solution is easier and will do the right job. If that's the case, I can
> > try to change the sources so strftime uses "%x" and not hardcoded
> > combinations of "%d" and "%m".
> 
> Using "%x" and "%X" sounds like the right way.  Please do, and submit
> your patches to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ for review.

..or attach them to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253
which should be the corresponding bug report to this issue.

andre
-- 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to