Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Matthew Barnes wrote: > >> there was concern that simply turning it on would somehow break existing >> installs. I'm fuzzy on the details, but vaguely recall it being about a >> field size in some binary file being dependent on sizeof(off_t), which >> would change with LARGEFILE support enabled and thus break the binary >> format. >> >> > > The summary files would have had this problem, but they would have just > been regenerated, so not really an issue. >
Also, this is why the summary files had versioning info. Jeff _______________________________________________ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
