--- Begin Message ---
Migration has been done and I'll submit the patch soon.
Regards
Punit
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:56 +0530, chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:34 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 11:21 +0530, chen wrote:
> > > Is it required ? Having it in ECalBackendStore simplifies the backend
> > > code to form the path based on the type (calendar,tasks,memos) at a
> > > single place rather than every backend doing it..
> >
> > Forming the path at a single place instead of all the backends doing it
> > is definitely the goal. My thought was just that ECalBackend can do it
> > as easily as ECalBackendStore, since ECalBackendStore does nothing else
> > with the URI + type it's given and the path still has to be shared with
> > ECalBackendCache somehow.
> >
> > Moving it to ECalBackend seemed cleaner to me, but I can try to keep
> > things as is if you'd prefer to avoid the API break.
> I am ok with having it in ECalBackend.
>
> >
> >
> > > Btw we could deprecate ECalBackendCache and update just
> > > ECalBackendStore.
> >
> > I thought of that, but evolution-mapi still uses ECalBackendCache pretty
> > heavily. Should we give Bharath and Milan some time to migrate off it
> > first?
> I hope they are doing it. Had a chat with Bharath a week back iirc as I
> realized just then that mapi was not migrated. It should take not more
> than half a day to migrate at the maximum. It should be more or less
> s/cache/store work :)
>
> - Chenthill.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers mailing list
> evolution-hackers@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
