On Mi, 2011-03-23 at 10:19 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 14:55 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Okay, I see your point. But if the split into individual files is merely > > to group code and not done to speed up compilation, wouldn't the > > following also work: > > 1. move current files into an internal sub-directory > > 2. introduce the new "include all" header > > 3. make all the traditional names symlinks to that one header > > > > That introduces the desired advantage (rearrange header content) without > > breaking the API. > > We'll be breaking APIs anyway in 3.1.
I thought that this break would go into 3.0 (see my initial reply). So if 3.1 requires changes anyway, then sure, go ahead and break it some more ;-) -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- patrick.o...@gmx.de http://www.estamos.de/ _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers