On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:52 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: 
> I thought that this break would go into 3.0 (see my initial reply). So
> if 3.1 requires changes anyway, then sure, go ahead and break it some
> more ;-)

Oh, I missed that in your first reply.  Sorry.

That was the plan originally, but keeping up with GTK3 prior to its
first stable release sucked up huge amounts of time during 2.91, at
least for me.  So a lot of my goals for 3.0 got pushed out.


_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Reply via email to