On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:00 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > I hope that eventually, we might be permitted to use the "real" > gnome-2-32 branch in GNOME git for this, rather than having to do it > elsewhere. If that branch is a "dead end" and would otherwise be unused, > then there's no harm in letting us use it as a more central location for > our collaboration, surely?
I'm fine with you using the "real" gnome-2-32 branch. Would even be nice to see another formal 2.32 release if enough patches accumulate. Per GNOME's six-month release cycle, upstream maintainers have pretty much wrapped up 3.0 and are now focused on 3.1. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers