On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Do, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the > > NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the > > gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3 > > candidate bugs/patches. > > Please consider backporting the fixes for e_cal_new_system_*(). They are > unusable in 2.32.x but I intended to use them soon in MeeGo. > > I'm not sure which fixed from the master branch are all needed, I hope > Matthew and Milan can provide a list.
I am trying hard not to bother Matthew and Milan; I don't want the continued maintenance of the gnome-2-32 branch to be a burden to them in any way. I have cherry-picked the patches from master which look relevant; please could you test what is currently in http://git.infradead.org/evolution-data-server-2.32.git git://git.infradead.org/evolution-data-server-2.32.git -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers