On Fr, 2011-04-08 at 16:31 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 15:31 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Do, 2011-04-07 at 11:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > Once this passes muster, I'll push these patches (probably *without* the > > > NTLM bits, if you're looking closely at what I included) to the > > > gnome-2-32 branches and perhaps start doing a 'final call' for 2.32.3 > > > candidate bugs/patches. > > > > Please consider backporting the fixes for e_cal_new_system_*(). They are > > unusable in 2.32.x but I intended to use them soon in MeeGo. > > > > I'm not sure which fixed from the master branch are all needed, I hope > > Matthew and Milan can provide a list. > > I am trying hard not to bother Matthew and Milan; I don't want the > continued maintenance of the gnome-2-32 branch to be a burden to them in > any way.
I know, but Matthew had already kindly offered some help here. > I have cherry-picked the patches from master which look relevant; please > could you test what is currently in > > http://git.infradead.org/evolution-data-server-2.32.git > git://git.infradead.org/evolution-data-server-2.32.git Listing sources shows local:/system instead of local:system and opening "local:system" also still fails. Milan pointed to the history of e-source.c, but I don't see which (other?) commits are needed to fix these issues. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers