On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:49 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:40 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 11:44 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:27 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > > i'm going to start moving camel into eds soon (on a branch, after i > > > > merge the messageinfo stuff back). its too hard to do any other way, > > > > particularly since i want to use libdb to solve some problems and this > > > > is the only practical way for it to have access to it. > > > > > > What is the story these days with libdb and file-format compatibility ? > > > > libdb is an embedded database. We just embed the version we want, > > its part of eds already. > (and so we as a result only use the one version). > > I'm thinking of doing some stuff where stable queues and the like are > needed to do it properly, and libdb seems a reasonable way to do it.
I dunno, maybe in this case, because its not data, its ok but we seem to have had a lot of pain with libdb in the past, witness the threading mutex issues on 64 bit platforms we just had. I will say having our own internal copy has helped a lot though. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
