On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 06:56 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:49 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > I'm thinking of doing some stuff where stable queues and the like are > > needed to do it properly, and libdb seems a reasonable way to do it. > I dunno, maybe in this case, because its not data, its ok but we seem to > have had a lot of pain with libdb in the past, witness the threading > mutex issues on 64 bit platforms we just had. I will say having our own > internal copy has helped a lot though. I agree. Ideally we should try to become less dependent on libdb, and eventually get rid of it. IMO. -- Hans Petter Jansson | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Evolution Developer | http://hp.cl.no/ _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
