On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 13:55 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 06:56 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:49 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > > I'm thinking of doing some stuff where stable queues and the like are > > > needed to do it properly, and libdb seems a reasonable way to do it. > > > I dunno, maybe in this case, because its not data, its ok but we seem to > > have had a lot of pain with libdb in the past, witness the threading > > mutex issues on 64 bit platforms we just had. I will say having our own > > internal copy has helped a lot though. > > I agree. Ideally we should try to become less dependent on libdb, and > eventually get rid of it. IMO.
Well, this might be impossible unless we right our own code to extract from the db files for migration purposes in the future. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
