I agree that evolution-data-server should be named better to convey that
it is a framework for the entire Desktop, not just Evolution.
Not now, though. Let us focus our energies on making it more useful and
usable. Let us document the APIs, write tutorials and make its adoption
easier on the Desktop.
Do continue thinking about cuter and more appropriate names
need them one day. A good dressing is a must but let us get the cake
ready first
--Harish.
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 15:56 -0700, Corey Burger wrote:Hello all, I am sorry if this has been brought up before, but a google search of the archives didn't turn up anything. Basically, people are getting confused at the similar naming between e-d-s and evo. They don't quite understand that while evo depends on e-d-s, the server is not actually part of evolution. Thus my recommendation is to rename e-d-s to something non-evolution, to make clear that it is more than just evolutions's-data-server. My thought was gnome-data-server, but there are lots. Thoughts? Corey PS. Yes, you can start shooting me know if this is crack. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
<<attachment: smiley-3.png>>
