On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 20:59 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: > On 5/12/05, Peter Colijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/12/05, Not Zed <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Most people just install their distro or use their distro's tool to > > > install > > > software, it handles any dependencies for them, so the name of the package > > > is irrelevent. > > > > For most users, yes. > > > > > Who is "people"? > > > > I think in most cases, probably developers. > > > > > Seems like a lot of effort to change eds for no real purpose. > > > > Yes, and work with very little (or no) tangible benefit is almost > > never worthwhile. I think in this case the idea is to garner more > > developer interest in e-d-s (though the original poster would have to > > confirm), which may prove beneficial. > > > > My 2 cents, anyway. > > > > Have fun, > > > > Peter > > > > When I have noticed the question come up is when people want to remove > evolution, and find e-d-s and don't understand the relationship > between the two. Basically, it is not developers but power-users. > and if they remove evolution, won't they be also confused by what's that *-data-server package?
As Michael, I see no benefit at all in changing the name, if that's the only reason. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
