On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 15:56 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: > Hello all, > > I am sorry if this has been brought up before, but a google search of > the archives didn't turn up anything. > > Basically, people are getting confused at the similar naming between > e-d-s and evo. They don't quite understand that while evo depends on > e-d-s, the server is not actually part of evolution. > > Thus my recommendation is to rename e-d-s to something non-evolution, > to make clear that it is more than just evolutions's-data-server.
Evolution is still the primary client of e-d-s, especially for data manipulation rather than read only access. If they are indeed power users, a quick google should probably explain whats up. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution-hackers maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
