On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 15:17 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > There is no "Reply To List Only". There's Reply To List, and that's > what > > they'll get with Ctrl-R. How would a "Reply To List Only" be > different? > > Um, sorry if I'm being dim... but "that's what they'll get with > Ctrl-R" > seems different to what you said you were advocating, which was: > > > - Reply To Author to reply to you alone. > > - Reply To All to CC the author and reply to the list (the reverse > of > > the current situation). > > - Ctrl-L to disappear, and Ctrl-R to change to reflect that it's > Reply > > To List. > > It seems to me that you're actually suggesting: > - Reply to Author (i.e. Ctrl-R) to reply to the list, not be > private.
No no no. Reply To Author is a reply to the author (sender) of the message, i.e. what you get currently with Ctrl-R, and what you'll still get with Ctrl-R when it's not a list message. This is very explicit in the original proposal. Sorry if it isn't clear. > - Reply to All to do the same as now but with cosmetic differences. > > If you really want to mollycoddle the idiots who can't manage to press > the right button, how about a pop-up which says: > > ================================================================= > > You are replying personally to the author of a message which > you received via a mailing list. Did you really mean to reply > privately, or did you mean use the "Reply to All" action? Or the Reply To List action. > [x] Never ask me this stupid question again. > > [ Reply privately ] [ Reply to All ] > > ================================================================= Maybe. I have no opinion on this. > We could also change the "Reply" button and menu item to say "Private > Reply" when it's a list message. I guess. Doesn't do anything for those who use Ctrl-R of course. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
