On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 16:18 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 15:50 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:12 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > No no no. Reply To Author is a reply to the author (sender) of the > > > > message, i.e. what you get currently with Ctrl-R, and what you'll still > > > > get with Ctrl-R when it's not a list message. This is very explicit in > > > > the original proposal. Sorry if it isn't clear. > > > > > > So how would you get Reply to Author if it _is_ a list message? > > > > Message->Reply To Author > > That's a *really* bad idea. The standard reply button and Ctrl-R should > give a *private* reply. Changing that to suddenly send *public* replies > is asking for trouble.
That's the whole essence of the original proposal. Your comments on the BZ page lead me to think that you had understood this since you made a counterproposal, to wit: > Currently, the 'reply to list' function does nothing if the list > headers aren't detected. > > Perhaps we could make it do the same as 'reply to all' in that case, > and then the people who want this feature could just bind the 'reply > to list' function to the Ctrl-Shift-R keystroke? To which I replied: > Making Reply To List turn into Reply To All when no list headers are present > is > not a bad alternative. I don't see the need for changing the keystroke binding > since Ctrl-L would Just Work. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
