please remove our email adresse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:57 PM Subject: evolution digest, Vol 1 #371 - 15 msgs > Send evolution mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of evolution digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Evo 1.4.3: fonts for menus, folders etc. (Lonnie Borntreger) > 2. font preferences don't exist anymore ? (THUaN) > 3. Re: font preferences don't exist anymore ? (Lonnie Borntreger) > 4. Re: Evolution Default Browser (guenther) > 5. Re: Evolution Default Browser (Jeffrey Stedfast) > 6. Re: Evolution Default Browser (guenther) > 7. Re: Duplicates removal (guenther) > 8. Re: Evolution Default Browser (guenther) > 9. Re: How do I keep message list from resorting? (guenther) > 10. Re: Re: working offline / headers only / IMAP (guenther) > 11. Re: Re: working offline / headers only / IMAP (Ettore Perazzoli) > 12. Re: Re: working offline / headers only / IMAP (guenther) > 13. Re: Evo 1.4.3: fonts for menus, folders etc. (Itzchak Rehberg) > 14. Re: Evolution Default Browser (Itzchak Rehberg) > 15. Can't create calendar item (Stuart Luppescu) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.4.3: fonts for menus, folders etc. > From: Lonnie Borntreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Evolution List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:46:00 -0500 > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 05:32, Itzchak Rehberg wrote: > > Yes, that would be great - but when I do so, the entire KDE desktop is > > gone (except the kicker) and replaced by a dark-blue background without > > any icons on - I suppose this is a part of the Gnome2 desktop. No > > chance: as soon as I start that gnome-settings-daemon my KDE desktop is > > gone, and the only way to regain it I found out so far is to log out and > > in again. > > I had the same problem. Here is how you fix it. > > Install (as root) and run (as yourself) gconf-editor. Go to > desktop->gnome->background and turn off the option to "draw_background". > > Then go to apps->nautilus->preferences and unset "show_desktop". > > Now all I need to figure out is how to stop gnome from hijacking my > mouse movement settings......... > > Lonnie Borntreger > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: THUaN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Evolution Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 23 Jul 2003 19:02:56 +0200 > Subject: [Evolution] font preferences don't exist anymore ? > > > --=-wJSpf3VYfugHE14bxPOD > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > hello, > > i've checked in the tools>settings to change the fonts used in mails. > but the section disappeared. i used to do it with the evo-1.2. > > what do i need to do to perfom this ? > > thanks all, > luna > > --=-wJSpf3VYfugHE14bxPOD > Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> > <HTML> > <HEAD> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> > <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.7"> > </HEAD> > <BODY> > hello, <BR> > <BR> > i've checked in the tools>settings to change the fonts used in mails. <BR> > but the section disappeared. i used to do it with the evo-1.2.<BR> > <BR> > what do i need to do to perfom this ?<BR> > <BR> > thanks all,<BR> > luna > </BODY> > </HTML> > > --=-wJSpf3VYfugHE14bxPOD-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] font preferences don't exist anymore ? > From: Lonnie Borntreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Evolution List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:04:01 -0500 > > > --=-RMoRuQ74KvOMSm84KisY > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 12:02, THUaN wrote: > > > i've checked in the tools>settings to change the fonts used in mails. > > but the section disappeared. i used to do it with the evo-1.2. > > > It's now under tools->settings->mail preferences > > Lonnie > > > --=-RMoRuQ74KvOMSm84KisY > Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> > <HTML> > <HEAD> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> > <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.7"> > </HEAD> > <BODY> > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 12:02, THUaN wrote: > <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> > <FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>i've checked in the tools>settings to change the fonts used in mails. <BR> > but the section disappeared. i used to do it with the evo-1.2.</I></FONT> > </BLOCKQUOTE> > <BR> > It's now under tools->settings->mail preferences<BR> > <BR> > Lonnie<BR> > <BR> > </BODY> > </HTML> > > --=-RMoRuQ74KvOMSm84KisY-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Default Browser > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:07:16 +0200 > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:40, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 11:25, guenther wrote: > > > Well, what about at least a button to launch the capplet? > > > > Where would the button go exactly? I'd rather not have the clutter. > > > > The main problem, as I see it, is with non-GNOME users... Maybe in that > > case we should auto-detect what desktop the user is running under and > > launch the appropriate browser? > > Nope. This would break the setting just as well as the option to set a > custom browser within Evolution (as I mentioned). > > Evolution will not necessarily be the only app that launches URI. Shall > Evo behave different from other Gnome apps then? > > > A handy solution would simply be, to give the users the option to set > the default Gnome browser as a shortcut from within Evolution. At least > that's the place most users are looking for it... > > > > (However, I don't know how hard it is for a GNOME app to figure out e.g. > > what browser KDE is configured to use. If we can just launch an > > executable that Does The Right Thing then it's trivial to do.) > > Gnome completely changed the settings between 1.x and 2.x. What, if KDE > will do the same for 4.x version? > > > Apart from that: IIRC most questions are by Gnome users asking how to > change that. Thus *no* automatic approach based on the desktop would do > it -- unless it automagically knows weather to launch Mozilla, Galeaon, > Opera, Konqueror, lynx, ... > > > Yeah, the freedesktop.org approach would be good -- if they only would > hurry up... > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:11:06 -0400 > From: Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Default Browser > > it would be too much work for our small development group. in fact, it'd > probably require a complete rewrite to make a KDE version. Just not > worth the effort. > > of course, that doesn't mean someone couldn't do it in their own spare > time... (evo is GPL afterall) > > Jeff > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ><Heresy> > > > >How about a KDE version? > > > ></Heresy> > > > >name withheld to protect the innocent > > > >_______________________________________________ > >evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Default Browser > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Itzchak Rehberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:18:26 +0200 > > > > The latter especially applies to those using Evo with KDE3. They a) had > > to install Gnome2 CC just for some little changes for Evo, and sometimes > > those changes don't even work (see previous postings from me concerning > > font problems). > > Hey, don't say this unless you have set the DPI values. ;) > > I *know* that was the issue for a friend of my -- and your symptoms > regarding fonts sound very familiar... > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Duplicates removal > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Denis O. Mikhalkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:26:01 +0200 > > > > Thoughts: > > - surely it shouldn't be automatic, manual, with short-cut. > > > > - the algorithm should be working that way so it doesn't delete > > different messages. But if he misses some duplicates it is ok. It might > > be based on headers I think, no body comparision is needed. If header is > > changed - ok, we miss some duplicates. > > > > - there is already successul implementation used by big number of users, > > TheBat, which has "Kill Duplicates" action on folder. May be you can > > just "import" the algorithm from it? It is described in its help system > > in details. I was using it for a long time and I was satisfied on its > > success/miss ratio. > > Which of the duplicates are to be kept?? > > For example: The one in my Inbox or the one in my archives? > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Default Browser > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:32:34 +0200 > > > > How about a KDE version? > > A KDE version of *what* wrt the subject? > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] How do I keep message list from resorting? > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Evolution list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:36:25 +0200 > > > > I looked in > > ~/evolution/config.xmldb, but I could find anything special about the > > one folder that still resorts. > > As you already have that behavior back again, just a note: > > config.xmldb isn't used at all since 1.3.x. It's only still there in > case of a downgrade. > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Re: working offline / headers only / IMAP > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:29:54 +0200 > > > > > This is definitely something I would find useful, if you could put it on > > > to the "To Do" list for the next release. > > > > For 2.0 we are should probably change the offline behavior so that it > > starts caching all the messages in the background when you connect so > > you have a copy of all messages at all times. Michael also had some > > neat ideas about providing configurable filters to decide what gets > > cached... > > Sounds like a perfect match for the IMAP rewrite. > > And wasn't IMAP rewrite scheduled for 1.6? Or was it delayed again? > > > > This was mentioned either here or on the hackers list (I forget which > > right now). > > Hackers, apparently... ;) > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Re: working offline / headers only / IMAP > From: Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 23 Jul 2003 15:04:33 -0400 > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:29, guenther wrote: > > > For 2.0 we are should probably change the offline behavior so that it > > > starts caching all the messages in the background when you connect so > > > you have a copy of all messages at all times. Michael also had some > > > neat ideas about providing configurable filters to decide what gets > > > cached... > > > > Sounds like a perfect match for the IMAP rewrite. > > Actually, Michael mentioned that this is doable with the current IMAP > implementation. > > > And wasn't IMAP rewrite scheduled for 1.6? Or was it delayed again? > > I think we are just skipping 1.6 as a version number. :-) > > I don't know how much of the IMAP stuff we can do for 2.0. Since it > seems a sizeable chunk of work and we are resource-limited it sounds > like the best approach would be to develop this in parallel with 2.0 but > not make it a blocker for 2.0. > > -- Ettore > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Re: working offline / headers only / IMAP > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:23:23 +0200 > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 21:04, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:29, guenther wrote: > > > > For 2.0 we are should probably change the offline behavior so that it > > > > starts caching all the messages in the background when you connect so > > > > you have a copy of all messages at all times. Michael also had some > > > > neat ideas about providing configurable filters to decide what gets > > > > cached... > > > > > > Sounds like a perfect match for the IMAP rewrite. > > > > Actually, Michael mentioned that this is doable with the current IMAP > > implementation. > > yep, right > > > > > And wasn't IMAP rewrite scheduled for 1.6? Or was it delayed again? > > > > I think we are just skipping 1.6 as a version number. :-) > > > > I don't know how much of the IMAP stuff we can do for 2.0. Since it > > seems a sizeable chunk of work and we are resource-limited it sounds > > like the best approach would be to develop this in parallel with 2.0 but > > not make it a blocker for 2.0. > > Well, if you would ask me (as if I don't know you won't ask me), finish > 1.6 ASAP and let 2.0 brew a little bit. And have that IMAP rewrite high > priority for 1.6 anyway. > > <comment type="insider"> > Seems, I'm feeling argumentative today, too. > </comment> > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.4.3: fonts for menus, folders etc. > From: Itzchak Rehberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Lonnie Borntreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Evolution List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 23 Jul 2003 21:44:04 +0200 > > > > Yes, that would be great - but when I do so, the entire KDE desktop is > > > gone (except the kicker) and replaced by a dark-blue background without > > > any icons on - I suppose this is a part of the Gnome2 desktop. No > > > chance: as soon as I start that gnome-settings-daemon my KDE desktop is > > > gone, and the only way to regain it I found out so far is to log out and > > > in again. > > I had the same problem. Here is how you fix it. > > Install (as root) and run (as yourself) gconf-editor. Go to > > desktop->gnome->background and turn off the option to "draw_background". > > Thanx - found an un-checked. > > > Then go to apps->nautilus->preferences and unset "show_desktop". > > No such setting. > > Does this also fix the problem with fonts being completely messed up? > There was no point on this (as I wrote in another posting: any app > started after the gnome-settings-daemon, regardless of KDE app or Gnome > app, has the fonts completely "replaced" by a single dot per line). > > > Now all I need to figure out is how to stop gnome from hijacking my > > mouse movement settings......... > > Humm - my mouse was not affected by weird behaviour... > > Izzy. > > -- > Itzchak Rehberg > http://www.qumran.org/homes/izzy/ > http://www.izzysoft.de/ > "We have joy, we have fun, we boot Linux on our SUN..." > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Default Browser > From: Itzchak Rehberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 23 Jul 2003 21:47:22 +0200 > > > > The latter especially applies to those using Evo with KDE3. They a) had > > > to install Gnome2 CC just for some little changes for Evo, and sometimes > > > those changes don't even work (see previous postings from me concerning > > > font problems). > > Hey, don't say this unless you have set the DPI values. ;) > > Yeah, if someone could tell me how to find out about this, I certainly > check it! > > > I *know* that was the issue for a friend of my -- and your symptoms > > regarding fonts sound very familiar... > > So do you know what he did to solve it? That would be *VERY* helpful to > me!! > > Thankx in advance > Izzy > > -- > Itzchak Rehberg > http://www.qumran.org/homes/izzy/ > http://www.izzysoft.de/ > "We have joy, we have fun, we boot Linux on our SUN..." > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 15 > From: Stuart Luppescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Evolution list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: University of Chicago > Date: 23 Jul 2003 14:56:20 -0500 > Subject: [Evolution] Can't create calendar item > > > --=-9Gt3wTqtohkvMO4PP+Hb > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Every time I try to save a new calendar entry I get this message: > Validation error: End time is wrong > > I don't see anything wrong with the end time. It even happens when I use > the default start and end times (9:00 and 9:30). Can anyone tell me > what's going on?=20 > --=20 > Stuart Luppescu -=3D- s-luppescu .at. uchicago.edu =20 > University of Chicago -=3D- CCSR=20 > =1B$B:MJ8$HCRF`H~$NIc=1B(B -=3D- Kernel 2.4.20-xfs-r3 =20 > You are an insult to my intelligence! I demand > that you log off immediately.=20 > =20 > > > --=-9Gt3wTqtohkvMO4PP+Hb > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQA/HuhkDBHcBS0tWxMRAv0bAJ4la7jd/QCrlpbp+xIpTPn/SmAgZgCfX9cC > 9qNw+5+WWyi+KVByow9x+Eo= > =bKvj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --=-9Gt3wTqtohkvMO4PP+Hb-- > > > --__--__-- > > > > > End of evolution Digest _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
